SYDNEY， Sept. 21 (Xinhua) --The Australian Taxation Office has hit BHP Billiton with fresh tax assessments over the mining giant's Singaporean marketing office， pushing the total claimed to more than ？1 billion Australian dollar (760 million U.S. dollars).
BHP's Singaporean operation， which employs about 400 people， has been under the microscope in a long-running audit， amid a tax office crackdown on the use of marketing hubs in the tax haven by Australian resources companies， NewsCorp reported on Wednesday.
In a previous audit， BHP was slugged 273 million U.S. dollars in extra taxes， interest and penalties for the period 2003-08. BHP's new bill， revealed by the company in a tax transparency report to be released Wednesday， adds 405 million U.S. dollars for the years 2009 to 2013 and an extra 88 million U.S. dollars in added mining tax.
The tax office last month drew a line in the sand over the use of Singaporean hubs， saying any company showing a profit margin of more than 100 percent in the tax haven would be at increased risk of a full-scale audit or legal action.
ATO's Deputy Commissioner Jeremy Hirschhorn told NewsCorp at the time "Doubling your money is very generous".
BHP chief financial officer Peter Beaven defended the Singaporean office as a vital link between mines in Australia and customers in China that pumped up the eventual price paid by customers.
"Each step is as important and legitimate as the next， including marketing，" Beaven said.
He said BHP was ready to fight the case in court.
"We're very confident of our position，" he said.
Legal action to resolve the stoush appears likely because， despite ongoing talks， BHP has so far been unable to strike a deal with the ATO.
Under a deal with the Singaporean government， BHP's marketing arm does not pay any tax in the city state.
However， about 58 percent of profit generated in Singapore is taxable in Australia.
BHP's report reveals that in addition to the Singaporean hub， it has 10 subsidiaries in tax havens including the British Virgin Islands and the Cayman Islands， although the company says most of them are legacies of previous ？acquisitions and are dormant or being wound up.
BHP is keen to distinguish itself from technology sector firms such as Apple， which late last month was on the wrong end of a European Commission ruling that found Ireland had failed to levy 14.5 billon U.S. dollars in tax on the tech giant.
Last year， BHP paid about 1.8 billion U.S. dollars in corporate tax to countries around the world， plus 1.48 billion U.S. dollars in royalties， its tax transparency report shows.
Beaven said BHP supported the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting program， a multinational push to crack down on tech？nology sector tax dodging， being co-ordinated by the Paris-based Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
The company's global head of tax， Jane Michie， said BHP would not be affected by Australia's new multinational anti-avoidance law， or "Google tax"， which is designed to stop companies dodging taxes by pretending sales here ？actually happen overseas.
"Transparency is absolutely critical to ensure that any public dialogue on the issue is in fact based on fact， not on ... populist misconceptions of who does what and who pays what，" he said.
"Public confidence in the ？integrity of tax rules， both ？globally and domestically， is a necessary aspect before you can have any meaningful debate about whether a country's tax system is delivering what that country needs." Enditem
Very recently Cowboys Jason Witten Jersey , the Commonwealth of Virginia required to me to obtain an embossed copy of my original birth certificate from the Oklahoma Department of Vital Records in order to qualify for a Virginia Driver’s license. An earlier embossed copy of my original birth certificate, which I had obtained for 15 dollars in 1981, was considered as unacceptable, since one of the Virginia DMV supervisors, in the City of Springfield, could not “feel” the embossing on the 28 year old copy. This frustrating happening caused me to ponder, even more so, the suspicious circumstances surrounding the Obama presidential eligibility issue.With the controversy as thick as it is, especially with the recent strange dismissal of the federal case “Keyes v. Obama” by California Federal District Judge David O. Carter, the matter of whether Barack H. Obama is a natural born citizen of the United States is far from being over. The issue of Obama’s eligibility to be a U.S. President is as suspicious as ever, and his obstinate refusal to produce his original Hawaiian birth certificate for public perusal, to the tune of over a million dollars that he has spent in legal costs to oppose the lawsuits against him, casts a long shadow of impropriety over his honesty and credibility. This original birth certificate, the one that is supposed to contain the same certified information that Virginia wanted from me, is the crux of the controversy. Why won’t he merely allow the original birth certificate to be published in the nation’s newspapers and on the Internet?The information listed on my certificate of live birth is much more than what is listed on that green document published by Obama on the Internet. I have discovered from the State of Hawaii that these green certificates of live birth may be regularly obtained, for a fee, by immigrant parents of children born in foreign countries. As opposed to what Obama claims is authoritative information on his green document, supposedly showing that he was born in Hawaii, the information contained on my certificate of live birth includes the following:1. Place of birtha. Countyb. City of Townc. Name of Hospital or Institutiond. Length of m. Cheap Nike Vapormax White Cheap Nike Vapormax 2018 Cheap Old Skool Flames Cheap Vans Old Skool Black Cheap Vans Old Skool White Cheap Vans Old Skool Pro Cheap Vans Old Skool Sale Cheap Vans Old Skool Grey Air Max 95 Shoes Sale Air Max 2017 Clearance